(Please note that the book '1984' was not just some fiction writing that appears to be coming true but the revelation of a multigenerational plan exposed by Wells as Cuddy tells you in this important article.  ".....George Orwell’s 1984 (published 1949) as fiction, but Orwell had been a Fabian Socialist and was actually warning people about a planned future dictatorship under Big Brother. " and "Another work most view as fiction is Aldous Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD (1932)."  Jan)

YOU WILL COME TO LOVE BIG BROTHER

By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
March 10, 2008
NewsWithViews.com

[Note: In my last article, I indicated that the power elite at the most recent Bilderberg meeting may have “directed a pullback” (at least temporarily) of an attack on Iran,” given Russia’s and China’s objections. It would be much easier to attack Iran’s oil ally, Venezuela, with its troublesome leader Hugo Chavez. But the U.S., couldn’t just attack Venezuela without an incident. What if U.S. ally Colombia just happened to have an incursion into Venezuela, and Venezuela responded with military action? The U.S. would then militarily have to come to the aid of Colombia and oust Chavez, wouldn’t it? The question is whether anyone would be gullible enough to believe such a scenario would happen just by accident!]

Most people see George Orwell’s 1984 (published 1949) as fiction, but Orwell had been a Fabian Socialist and was actually warning people about a planned future dictatorship under Big Brother. When Big Brother’s agent O’Brien is torturing Winston, who eventually reluctantly submits, O’Brien tortures him again and Winston is bewildered because he has already submitted. However, O’Brien explains that the goal is to have people submit not out of fear, but because they have actually come to love Big Brother and his rule over them.

Another work most view as fiction is Aldous Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD (1932). However, it too was about a real future we will face. On March 20, 1962, Huxley at U.C.-Berkeley revealed there will be “scientific dictatorships of the future.” He stated: “If you can get people to assent to the state of affairs in which they are living, the state of servitude,… it seems to me that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced is precisely this—that we are in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the controlling oligarchy, who have always existed and presumably always will exist, to get people actually to love their servitude. People can be made to enjoy a state of affairs which by any decent standard they ought not to enjoy. And these methods, I think, are a real refinement on the older methods of terror, because they combine methods of terror with methods of acceptance. Among the various other methods which one can think of, there is, for example, the pharmacological method,… and the result would be that you can imagine a euphoric which would make people thoroughly happy even in the most abominable circumstances. I mean these things are possible!”

Before a single Big Brother, or the Antichrist, is in place, those who are executing the plan of control over us are called by myself the power elite. Historically, they include people such as John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. More recently, they include notables such as David Rockefeller and international financier George Soros (head of Soros Fund Management). I’ve already written about David Rockefeller’s admission in his MEMOIRS (2002) that he’s part of a secret cabal moving us toward world government. I’ve also referred to historical power elite member (and Skull & Bones member) William Whitney’s plan to contribute heavily to both major parties, and then alternate power so the stupid public thinks it’s had a choice when it actually doesn’t. The power elite really controls our choices.

Regarding the 2008 presidential race, U.S. Senator (and CFR member) John McCain now has the Republican nomination sewed up. But if McCain is a real conservative, why is he chairman of the Reform Institute (to which ultra-liberal Senator John Kerry’s wife also belongs), which has received a great deal of funding from leftist George Soros?

In Richard Poe’s and David Horowitz’s THE SHADOW PARTY (2006), they describe how Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties radicals seized control of the Democratic Party. Soros has been very close to Hillary Clinton for a long time, but he’s also contributed heavily to her chief Democratic presidential rival Barack Obama.

At this point, it may be worth mentioning other interesting connections. During Bill Clinton’s presidency, Hillary was in charge of a large health-care task force dominated by people connected with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF). One of the RWJF’s primary concerns is mental health services for youth. There is a new diagnostic method (created by Zero to Three) that determines youth’s predisposition to a mental health problem called “reduced neuronal plasticity.” Cortex Pharmaceuticals manufactures a new chemical compound called Ampakine, which “restores neuronal plasticity.” Cortex’s largest shareholder is Quantum Partners (QP) in the Cayman Islands, and QP is controlled by Soros Fund Management.

Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have acknowledged admiration for Saul Alinsky (Clinton wrote her college senior thesis about him), who asserted in RULES FOR RADICALS (1971) that “any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the masses of people.” He continued to say that the radical organizer “dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of a community, fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues…. An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontentment…. He knows that all values are relative…. Truth to him is relative and changing.” Alinsky even included an acknowledgment to Lucifer at the front of this book.

To show how the power elite operates, Alinsky in 1940 founded the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF). John D. Rockefeller’s Rockefeller Foundation and Andrew Carnegie’s Carnegie Corporation have given a great deal of money to these IAF, which works with organizations, schools, and in churches in most states of the U.S. and uses the Alinsky Method (otherwise called the Delphi Technique) to accomplish its objectives. This method uses facilitators asking questions designed to push for consensus toward outcomes designed or predetermined by the facilitators.

What’s all this got to do with the power elite’s global objectives? The Alinsky Method has been used to promote school-to-work programs. “Engaging the Public: One Way to Organize” is a Concept Paper produced by the IAF for the National Alliance for Restructuring Education. And in this document, one reads that “schools face the challenges of preparing students for a labor market in an economy that is increasingly mobile in nature, and requires of its workers the ability… to be ‘lifelong learners’.” The IAF holds meetings “designed to enable individuals to develop an awareness of their interdependency with others.” In other words, workers are being prepared to work in an interdependent global economy.

Notice how the power elite often stays one step removed from the entities executing their plan. This is to hide their involvement and deflect any public ire or blame.

Another area in which this is evident is the oil industry. Before Dick Cheney became Vice-President he was head of Halliburton. Addressing the CFR some time ago, he said “it’s good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations. I’ve been a member for a long time and was actually director for some period of time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for re-election back home in Wyoming.” In other words, keep hidden from the people of his state that he’s a member of the CFR. Following his statement, CFR members in attendance laughed knowingly.

During his leadership of Halliburton, Cheney forecasted that gasoline prices would rise to above $2.00 per gallon. This seemed unbelievably high at that time, but proved extremely accurate. How would Cheney know what was going to happen? It’s because the rise in oil prices was manufactured by the power elite. However, in order to keep this hidden and divert blame, the power elite used the following strategy.

Their foundations heavily subsidized the environmental movement, which pressured federal, state and local governments to enact stringent rules and regulations that resulted in restrictions on the construction of oil refineries. In my February 6, 2006 NewsWithViews column titled “Mental Health, Education and Social Control, Part 25,” I noted that “the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights has on its website internal memos from Chevron, Mobil and Texaco years ago showing their desire to limit oil refining in order to increase prices.”

Not only does the lack of construction of any new oil refineries increase the price of gasoline, but the lack of any increased refinery capacity allows oil reserves to remain in the ground longer, thus insuring even higher prices for it later. In addition, environmentally imposed regulations also add to the cost of producing anything, thus providing an incentive to any company to move overseas wherever (e.g., China) such regulations don’t exist. This also is part of the power elite’s plan. And who gets the blame? It’s the environmentalists, not the hidden power elite who planned it.

The power elite also uses coercive tactics in which the people actually consent to their power grab. For example, the power elite planned the TransTexas Corridor (TTC) as part of a TransAmerican Superhighway to connect the U.S., Canada, and Mexico in a North American Union. Obviously, the people of Oklahoma have objected to the TTC coming into their state, so what will the power elite do? Author Jerome Corsi has suggested they might have the Federal Highway Administration threaten to withhold federal highway funds from Oklahoma unless they consent. Because of Americans’ great dependency on the federal highway system for transporting people, food, building supplies, etc., the elected Oklahoma legislature will probably reluctantly consent.

I believe if the public in general complains about this tactic, they will be reminded that they have already consented to it in principle when their elected members of Congress passed No Child Left Behind. This federal law requires each state to submit its education plan to the federal U.S. Secretary of Education for approval before the state can receive federal education funds under this legislation. Because state governments greatly desire these funds, most states have consented to submit their plans for approval.

In other words, the people “have come to love Big Brother,” just as Big Brother’s agent O’Brien said they would in George Orwell’s 1984.

As I’ve written many times before, the power elite’s plan is to bring about a World Socialist Government, and in my books I have reproduced a 1911 cartoon showing Rockefeller, Carnegie, etc. welcoming Karl Marx and his “Socialism” to Wall Street. Today’s upper class in the U.S. is furthering this process by sending their children to universities such as Duke, known as the Ivy League school of the South.

Duke students are primarily the sons and daughters of oil, banking, insurance, etc., executives and Duke is very proud of the number of Marxist professors there. In Accuracy in Academia’s April 1987 CAMPUS REPORT, one reads: “Dr. Malcolm Gillis, vice-provost of Duke University, thanked some 100 Marxist professors, graduate students and activists for gathering at Duke on March 13-15. Dr. Gillis said that by holding the Southeast Marxist Scholars Conference there, they were ‘helping us to increase the visibility of Marxist programs on this campus.’ Gillis said, ‘When I left this campus 20 years ago, there were very few Marxists here. When I returned in 1984, I saw Marxists in many parts of the social science faculty.’… Professor Allen Zagarell, professor of anthropology at Duke, organized the conference. Professor Zagarell refused to confirm or deny that he is the Al Zagarell who is the brother of Mike Zagarell, editor of the PEOPLE’S DAILY WORLD, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, U.S.A…. In a (conference) seminar on Marxism and religion, Toby Terrar of the National Lawyers Guild declared, ‘the United States is the enemy.’”

Many people today look at this type of Marxist influence on society as coming from the Frankfurt School. While that is true, it’s important to remember that it’s the elite who conceptualized Marxism in order to develop a dialectical process with capitalism in order to achieve a World Socialist Government. Karl Marx was taught the collectivist socialism of Saint-Simon by Marx’s father-in-law Ludwig von Westphalen, and Marx was actually paid by the League of the Just to write the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. The League was not comprised of poor workers but rather the intellectual and some business elites who were descendants of the Illuminati vision of Weishaupt, Goethe, Pestalozzi, etc. They saw themselves as the new “philosopher kings,” who would rule over the masses.

At the beginning of the 20th century, the business elite teamed with the intellectual elite in the field of education to pursue their dream. John D. Rockefeller hired Baptist minister Frederick Gates to direct Rockefeller’s General Education Board, Rockefeller Foundation, International Health Board, and to be chairman of the board of trustees of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (involved in eugenics). The year after the 1911 cartoon I mentioned earlier, Gates authored “The Country School of To-morrow” (THE WORLD’S WORK, August 1912), in which he revealed the elite’s plan by writing: “In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unfettered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk.” In other words, these people “will come to love Big Brother.”

© 2008 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved

Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.

E-Mail: Not Available